Agent shorts: ToolSpace, Axion 1.0, DEPTH, Switch-SWE, Caper, Recursa, GUI-agent RL, DeepSeek's super-agent harness
Sources: HuggingFace 2026-11-04: ToolSpace 2611.05036, Axion 1.0 2611.03233, DEPTH 2611.01927, Switch-SWE 2611.02017, Caper 2610.40753, Recursa 2611.04035, GUI agents: where to learn 2610.39251, EvoTeam 2610.39813 · X: RSI-Dojo 2611.03698 via @dair_ai · Ken Huang: DeepSeek super-agent, Harness Engineering book · Agent Arena (@arena)
TL;DR. The agent papers this window are mostly about measuring and building better environments, plus two cost-efficiency results. ToolSpace mines real MCP execution traces for data, state and retry dependencies between adjacent tool calls (deterministic rules, no LLM judge), clusters them into environments, and decompiles state-aware random walks into tasks with assertion checks; "Pro" versions of AutomationBench and tau3-Bench Banking drop seven frontier models by up to 38.2 points. DEPTH shows synthetic terminal tasks add work, not depth: 94% of solved synthetic tasks pass within three turns, and depth (turns that must happen in sequence) predicts difficulty beyond work. Switch-SWE: interleaving unfinished tasks in the same repo costs seven coding agents 11.5 points on average (6-15). Caper pre-executes each shell command in a snapshotted sandbox and shows an independent approver the observed effects; harmful-outcome rate 6.7% vs at least 14.8% for six existing approvers, 7.8% vs 35.3% when the harm hides inside invoked tools, while blocking only 1% of safe twins. Axion 1.0 is a fully open agent model trained in only SFT, SFT, RL (no mid-training, DPO or OPD), with the whole recipe released. GUI-agent RL that restarts from saved intermediate checkpoints instead of the task root cuts environment interaction 56-61% versus vanilla GRPO while improving success. Recursa grows a skill-and-memory repository with parallel learners and raises Harvey LAB held-out all-pass from 30% to 55% on DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash. RSI-Dojo turns papers into 281 post-training tasks; fine-tuning on filtered trajectories lifts a 35B-A3B MoE by 16.87 points on PostTrainBench.
Harness practice
- DeepSeek's super-agent (dsh): an event-driven daemon over Git, one worktree per task, deterministic admission gates before any inference, and an orchestrator that never runs shell commands or waits on workers (a router on a lighter model). Ken Huang extracts it into a cross-harness skill with a "Rule of Three" ceiling on parallel subagents.
- Ken Huang's book names ten harness pattern families (autonomy boundaries, scoped identity, intent contracts, context isolation, memory governance, observability, runtime steering, fleet scalability, data governance, empirical evaluation). A taxonomy, not evidence.
- Agent Arena economics: an hour of agent work averages 332 tool calls; median cost per hour $10.51 (Gemini 4 Carbon), $21.13 (Opus 5.5), $31.08 (GPT-6 Astra). On the costliest 5% of sessions OpenAI and Anthropic hold 7 of 11 frontier spots versus 10 of 11 on cheap tasks.
How it relates to prior wiki pages
- DEPTH and ToolSpace confirm the Prime Intellect benchmark audit (11-04: graders that reject correct answers, leaked solutions): agent benchmarks overstate difficulty and progress. Both replace LLM-judged difficulty with execution-grounded structure.
- Caper extends LeanGuard (11-04, tool calls checked against a Lean4 policy that fails closed): approval is moving from reading the command to observing its effects.
- Switch-SWE pairs with the 11-04 continual-harness-evolution result (94% to 32% on SWE-Bench after evolving elsewhere): both measure interference across tasks, at runtime and at evolution time.
- GUI-agent checkpoint restarts are the training-side cousin of NVIDIA's compaction (today): don't replay a prefix you have already mastered.
Related: Agent harness engineering · Agent benchmarks · Agent training environments · Self-evolving agents